01 / RESEARCH FINDING

What the source reports

In product-innovation exercises with 776 P&G professionals, individuals using AI matched the performance of teams without AI. The experiment also explored expertise sharing across professional boundaries.

02 / OUR INTERPRETATION

What it means for an assessment

Consider access to expertise and how work is organised, alongside the speed of an isolated task.

03 / LIMITS OF THE EVIDENCE

What needs caution

Exercises at one company. Similar experimental output does not demonstrate that teams or jobs can be replaced.

A question to bring to the client case

Where does work depend on access to another specialist? Investigate whether AI assistance could help a person prepare a better first draft or bring additional perspectives to a discussion. Assess the contribution and review responsibilities before changing how the team works.

The practical interpretation is Versta’s. The linked source provides the research evidence; suitability and expected value must be assessed for the customer’s own circumstances.