What the source reports
Human–AI combinations did not consistently outperform the better of the human or AI alone. Results differed between decision tasks and content creation.
02 / OUR INTERPRETATIONWhat it means for an assessment
Define what the reviewer checks and when to override or escalate. Human review needs a workable process.
What needs caution
Studies through June 2023 with varied designs. Accountability can require human oversight even without a measured performance gain.
A question to bring to the client case
What exactly would the human reviewer do? Define which errors they can detect, what information they receive, when they can override the output and how much review costs. A named reviewer is insufficient if the workflow gives them neither the means nor the time to check.
The practical interpretation is Versta’s. The linked source provides the research evidence; suitability and expected value must be assessed for the customer’s own circumstances.